COMMENTARY: AIG Bailout
by Babette Maxwell
I, for one, am impressed with the immediate attention given by the Obama administration and New York State Attorney General's Office to exorbitant bonuses--$165 million of which was payable on Sunday--on the docket for AIG executives.
First, it is taxpayer money that bailed these guys out. That's me. That's you. That's all of us. Those of us struggling to make ends meet, find odd jobs for any kind of money and who pay our bills responsibly are the ones whose hard-earned tax dollars are being used to bail out the company with the largest corporate fourth quarter loss in history---$61.7 billion.
Second, any kind of bonus should have been contingent upon performance. And, I'm saying, if the company you work for required a $170 billion government bailout, you didn't perform.
Third, we're performing so they don't have to. I say again, it is our money going into their pockets. We're not getting our own money back here. We are funding their second homes, their new decks and their first class vacations. I'm sorry, but I find it increasingly more difficult to find sympathy for the executives waiting for their handouts/bonuses. They are, after all, the ones who didn't perform. And, it's because you and I did that we can afford to bail these executives out of their financial hole.
Fourth, those working for AIG should be grateful they even have a job. Without the government (read: the taxpayers) coming to the company’s rescue, AIG would have declared bankruptcy and they’d all be unemployed. That means no salary, let alone a bonus.
Exclusive of your home, shouldn’t a job really be your largest asset?
I find it nauseating that at a time when retirees have lost everything, unemployment is up and families' net worth have been cut in half, that $165 million in taxpayer’s money is even being considered allocated to a group of executive failures.
I am hoping, really hoping, that Attorney General Cuomo and Secretary Geithner find a way to stop these atrocities because someone needs to make these executives accountable for their failures. Perhaps they should fire them all and hire some of those who are unemployed. The government does now own 80% of AIG.
Related Articles:Has Money Gone High-Tech?Declare Your
Financial
IndependenceHow Free is FreeTell
Your
Bank
Account
Who’s
BossGive Green This Christmas
Rate this content:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Log in |
Register
User comments:| Sweetness75 | 3/18/2009 7:19:19 AM | I have to wonder if the reason Obama popped out of nowhere to become President, was just so he could bail out his own pocketbook.
There should have been a contract with strict terms at the very least given to these companies who got bailed out, instead they are free to repeat the same things which got them to this point in the first place.
Oh and did you know that these same companies, ie. banks/credit unions who got all this free money are putting such high restrictions on whom they loan money to, that even if you have good credit, it's not good enough.
By the way it's not the millions of dollars lent to defaulting consumers that got us in this whole, it's the billions of dollars given to executives as bonuses.
Our spouses have/are and will fight, some gave/give their lives for this country, should our new President be allowed to disrespect them in this way by freely giving their hard earned meager salaries to greedy corperations?
As for bringing our guys home, spouses he duped all whom voted for him, he is bringing them home just to turn around and send them right back, only changing the term war to advisory.
Maybe he is changing the name to legally be able take away some of our spouses deployment benefits?
probably needing it to pay for the bailout?
Anyways this is a very sad time for our country.
We really need this post haste:
God please Bless America!
| | Jerry | 3/18/2009 7:51:14 AM | What many people seem not to realize is that not only are some corporate and bank employees and leaders at fault for this economic crises, but so are many members of Congress. The people should hold their representatives accountable. Despite what some claim, they were warned! Barney Frank claimed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were sound when people questioned their extensive involvement in sub-prime loans. He and others in Congress were supposed to be providing oversight! Remember in 2010!
| | Del | 3/18/2009 9:33:32 AM | Very well written article. Please forward to MSM for inclusion in Op-Ed pages. Having said that -- I feel that AIG folks should not have been paid their bonus $$. They should have gotten IOU's. This would have been acceptable IAW their contracts. "Yes, we owe you the $$ but when we show a profit, then come back and see us and we'll make it right. Course, you understand that we have to pay our 80% new stockholders (US taxpayers) FIRST. BTW: Pls Hold that check...Also, when you are applying for your new job -- down play your role with AIG. Your chances of employment are greater if you at least act like you were not a part of the scheme to rob the store.
| | Doggiemom | 3/18/2009 9:57:03 AM | This is great! Thank you for including issues like this on Mil Spouse. This rewards and endorses bad business practices. Is not a bonus for above and beyond good work? What did they do to get a bonus? Why are they not fired? It's as thought they were put in "time out" for five minutes then given a hug and said it will be okay? Here's a cookie!!!
| | newsgal | 3/18/2009 1:28:38 PM | First, I don't see what the AIG bailout has to do with being a military spouse.
Secondly, if Obama had been so concerned about bonuses being paid by companies receiving bail-out money, then he should have read the bail-out bill before he signed it. His own party included stipulations protecting any contractual bonuses agreed upon prior to 11 Feb 2009. AIG wanted money, and the government threw it at them with NO strings attached (despite Republican efforts), likely as the result of AIG first throwing money into the election campaign coffers of key Democrat leaders, such as Obama, Dodd, and Pelosi. There is nothing Obama can do about those bonuses, and he knows it. To begin tampering with this country's contract law would be detrimental to our way of life.
Thirdly, AIG is a private company. Why, pray tell, would you endorse the idea of the Federal Goverment dictating to a private company who they may and may not keep on staff? That would be a slippery slope this country can not afford, unless you believe we should indeed become the next formerly great Socialist Republic. If we permit the government to adopt that role for big businesses, we should expect the government to also assume that role for small businesses. Do you really want someone who knows nothing about your business dictating your business decisions to you? I should think not.
And finally, you would lable greed an atrocity? No, dear. The things are husbands and wives are combating in the many corners of the world, torture, disfigurement, rape, murder as punishment for expressing disenting political, religious and philosophical opinions, THOSE are atrocities. September 11 was an atrocity. I would expect a woman of your education and position could come up with a more appropriate term to describe simple selfishness.
| | Brenda | 3/18/2009 10:33:05 PM | Babette you are right on when you say this is an atrocity. If one looks up the definition they will see that it is:
the state of being atrocious
Atrocious 1. extremely or shockingly wicked, cruel, or brutal: an atrocious crime.
2. shockingly bad or tasteless; dreadful; abominable: an atrocious painting; atrocious manners.
And as for relating to us as military spouses, it effects us if we have any money invested in the stock market or we pay taxes. It's just as relevant to have an article about AIG as it is to discuss Stretching your Dating Dollar or Postpartum Depression.
Aside from all that isn't it up to the Editor to discuss what they would like too???
| | Chelle | 3/19/2009 8:16:08 AM | To the person wondering what this issue has to do with being a military spouse: Everything. Money is tight right now. When taxpayer money is handed over to private corporations as a bail out, it isn't going somewhere else. Since our families rely on taxpayer dollars to feed, clothe, and protect us, I think this article entirely relevant.
Besides, I think we need to step outside of ourselves every once in a while and examine situations that aren't right at our fingertips.
| | Babette | 3/20/2009 12:35:09 PM | It is great to have all sides discussed. I think--and it is just my opinion--any taxpayer would be interested in the AIG bonus allocations. But, to be clear, this commentary (read: opinion) was addressing the topic of the bonuses, not the bailout.
Also, Brenda is correct on the definition of the word atrocity.
And, as I stated, I am impressed that they (those mentioned above) are addressing the matter rather than trying to confuse the public with legal ease and jargon, or hoping we all simply forget it about it. That's all I'm saying.
| | writergal | 3/21/2009 3:33:06 PM | Babette,
Thanks for posting this commentary piece. I like to see different, researched opinions on current affairs. Not everything about being military spouses is kids, deployments, and how to get the smell of jet fuel out of uniforms. We are dynamic people, with varying interests and experiences. And while we share the wonderful experience of being military families, we still have vastly varying backgrounds and life situations, which leads us to form different opinions given the same information. So, first point, as a tax paying citizen, I enjoyed reading your take in this piece.
2nd point – unmitigated greed, gain at any cost, and deceptive and corrupted business practices are atrocities, the acceptance and practice of which has been a huge detriment to the fabric of our communities and society at large. I’m glad you named them as such.
|
Post a comment
|
Enlisted Quarterly Assignment Listing
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|